Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Upset In Iowa

This is part of the candidate series on MyDD.  I've signed up to volunteer after Christmas in Iowa for the Richardson campaign.

In 2004, Richard Gephardt went negative on front runner Howard Dean, and Dean counter attacked.  Voters in Iowa were turned off. Two candidates with positive messages, John Kerry and John Edwards, came from behind to win.  Six weeks before the election Kerry was polling in the mid teens and Edwards was still in the single digits.

Could we be soon witnessing a repeat of 2004?  Clinton, Obama and Edwards are locked in a tie for first place, and the race is starting to heat up.  As reported by Iowa political commentator David Yepsen:

The 2008 Edwards doesn't sound much like the 2004 Edwards Iowa Democrats came to admire. Now, he sounds increasingly sharp-edged in campaign stump speeches that often border on class-warfare politics. He's started flaying away at the Clinton years in the White House. He and Obama talk about Clinton's support from lobbyists. Clinton has started pushing back about Obama's lack of experience, recently pointing out that living for a few years in a foreign country as a child hardly makes you a foreign-policy expert.

Back and forth it goes. At one level, it's a good thing. Democratic caucus-goers are entitled to vet candidates and see them probe one another's weaknesses before the GOP does it in the November campaign.

But Democrats have to be careful about this stuff. Edwards' negativity mars the sunny, moderate image that served him well in 2004. Obama's attacks distract from the politics of hope he likes to preach. Clinton's attacks just undercut her efforts to change her image as a cold-hearted candidate.

Whom might benefit if it gets ugly at the top?  Yepsen highlights Richardson:

Richardson holds a firm grip on fourth place in the race. He's done that with a combination of hard work - he's been in 98 counties - a positive message and some genuinely humorous television advertising earlier in the campaign.

"I sense a lot of grass-roots momentum, especially in rural areas," Richardson said in an interview. He packed more than 200 people into the meeting room at the Saylor Township fire department on Saturday afternoon last week. They were mostly older and blue-collar union Democrats, the kind of folks who show up at caucuses.

"We're getting huge crowds," he said. "I sense this race is not over. Polls show 50 percent undecided. There's a lot of fluidity. Iowans are known for making up their minds at the last minute."

How is it going for Richardson in Iowa?  The Washington Post reported:

New Mexico Bill Richardson has barnstormed 95 of Iowa's 99 counties, wooing rural Democrats with his pro-gun record and urban caucus goers with his aggressive Iraq withdrawal plan. He has fielded questions on every imaginable subject, from term limits to the space station. The Richardson style is frank but casual. He leans forward in his cowboy boots, fists jammed in his suit pocket.

. . .His niche is the positive moderate, similar to Edwards circa 2004. Indeed, Richardson is trying to eat into Edwards' support among working class, small town caucus goers. "I think Edwards tends to attract the same people I need to attract," Richardson said. His events also draw large numbers of older women - part of Clinton's target audience. "I like her, but I think she's too polarizing," said Mary Kathryn Gepner, a librarian who attended a Richardson event in Mt. Ayr, and lists Edwards and Richardson as her first and second choices.

The following video will give you a sense of how Iowa voters are responding to Richardson:

What vision is Richardson articulating for America when he speaks to Iowa voters?  Richardson recently outlined his vision for our nation at the end of a speech on a new farm policy for America:

Unfortunately, in Washington today there's too much negativity. Negativity over health care. Negativity over immigration.

But when I travel around Iowa, I see something different. I am reminded again that we are a positive nation, founded on inspiring principles.

I see a place where character is more than the contents of your bank account. Where leadership means more than a list of things you plan to do.  Where your neighbor's word is more important than all the smooth talk in the world.  I see a people who reward those who work hard; but also recognize that even the hardest workers cannot do it alone.

I see a nation attached to our land, but rooted in our values. I have a vision of America in ascendancy. It's a vision that all our people, whether they are in blue, red our purple states can share.

This is America. We landed a man on the moon. We built the internet. We beat the Great depression. We defeated the Nazis. We routed the Soviet Union in a global battle over the future of the planet.

So my message for all those who are pessimists, those who are negative, those who are angry is this:  We can do it.

To those who said I couldn't get those hostages out of Sudan -- I said I can. And I did it.

To those who say we can't get a fair deal for our family farmers -- I say we can.

To those who say we can't we can't revitalize our rural economy -- I say we can.

To those who say we can't conserve our land and water -- I say we can.

To those who say we can't spark a new energy revolution -- I say we can.

To those who engage in the politics of personal attacks -- I say we can do better.

If we work together, we can solve our problems. We can. And we will.

Finally, in news away from Iowa, Richardson this week picked up a significant labor endorsement in Nevada.  Local 396 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) endorsed Richardson. Local 396 represents more than 2,400 electrical workers in the Las Vegas region.  It is one of the most well-organized and powerful unions in Nevada.



Display:


Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (2.00 / 0)

I can't stop laughing, and I'm undecided. But the thought of Richardson winning anything more than the VP is why I complained to Jerome about this format wasting valuable front page space. I'm laughing, but obviously you don't get the joke.

I feel more strongly that this doesn't belong on the front page than any views about the also ran.

It it sad, if anything I feel sorry. It is pathetic for a candidate to game the system in a way that circumvents the lack of support. I'm laughing and not the only one.


Bob Brigham Blog
by Bob Brigham on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 03:09:50 AM EST

Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (none / 0)

Enthusiasm for our candidates is what makes this party strong.  Once you've succeeded in squelching everyone's dream that doesn't meet your petty little personal threshold of viability, tell me, how much passion is going to be left in the room?  Is it really so terrible that someone believes in Bill Richardson and thinks he would make a great President?  Perhaps you don't understand that we're all supposed to be playing on the same team in the end.

You're nothing but an ass and a bully.  "Ha ha, your candidate has no chance to win so I'm laughing at you."  How pathetic.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 03:56:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Republican Troll (none / 0)

And your opinion qualifies as truth how?

That is so undemocratic and unamerican it is sad.


by SocialDem on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 06:41:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I disagree with you (none / 0)

I've felt for much of the year that Richardson had the potential to finish in the top three in Iowa. I still think he has room to gain support, as I hear a lot of undecided voters say they are considering him.

At this point I think it would be a longshot for him to finish in the top three, given the gains Obama and Clinton have made since the early summer. But I don't share your sentiment about this diary.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 08:58:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You aren't the only one (none / 0)

I wanted to stop reading after the eye-rolling "punditry" of Yepsen.  Edwards was polling in first place in Iowa for most of the year, he has only slipped recently as Obama and Hillary have finally started to match his level of organization there.  Edwards' favorables are still rediculously high, possibly the best of any of the Democrats there.  Class warfare?  Oh no! He has the gall to suggest that our current policies are favoring the rich over the poor!

Yepsen then attacks Obama for criticizing Hillary, after months of pundits attacking Obama for NOT criticizing Hillary.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

And finally Yepsen repeats the claim that Hillary is fighting an image of her as a "cold-hearted candidate".  Anyone who has even been paying the least bit of attention to this year's polling would have realized that Hillary has made HUGE positive shifts in her approval ratings and personal popularity.  Democrats love her, and it shows.

The diarist uses these idiotic memes to disparage all three leading candidates so that he can somehow justify the hilarious notion of Bill Richardson actually being a serious contender.  A quick trip to pollster.com's page for Iowa will show you that Richardson is trending down.  Biden may very well pass him.

I agree, these lame candidate diaries may have been a good idea in theory, but in practice they are wasting valuable space on a blog that has clearly seen better days.


by Skaje on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 08:14:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (none / 0)

It is a myth that Kerry ran a purely positive campaign in Iowa. Towards the very end maybe but I seem to recall him being only a touch less hard on Dean than Gephardt and Lieberman.


by conspiracy on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 07:32:00 AM EST

Upset In Iowa (none / 0)

I think the campaign must have ruined Bill's diet, because it looks like he's putting a lot of the weight back on.

Policy-wise, Richardson has an attrocious record as a pro-gun, pro-NAFTA DLC Democrat whose favorite Supreme Court Justice was an anti-choice judge.  I also can't get over his gaffes.  Come on Giuliani, it's either Boston or New York.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 07:47:55 AM EST

Re: Upset In Iowa (none / 0)

The same reason that there are Ron Paul supporters is the same way Bill Richardson built some anti-war support.

He's dishonest about the issue, but it's a cover-up for a record and rhetoric that has a history of being not just un-progressive, but also anti-progressive.


Help build a stronger and more progressive Democratic Party from the grassroots on up
by Peter from WI on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 10:25:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Richardson consistent on Iraq (none / 0)

The last thing Richardson has been is dishonest on Iraq.  He has repeatedly called for a withdrawal of all US forces from Iraq throughout the campaign and pledges to bring our troops home within a year.  Obama, Clinton and Edwards at the debate at Dartmouth refused to commit to bring our troops home by 2013.  

Plus, Richardson's view prior to the invasion was that the U.S. must be patient and place the matter of invading Iraq to a vote of the Security Council prior to commencing hostilities.  This view was rejected by many in Congress, including John Edwards and Hillary Clinton, and ultimately was the path President Bush pursued.

On March 11, 2003, eight days before President Bush announced the U.S. was at war with Iraq, Richardson criticized the Bush Administration's rush to war in an interview on CNN.  At the time, most Americans supported going to war and were critical of the U.N.

Richardson defended the work of the U.N. Richardson accurately predicted how unilateral U.S. military action in Iraq would hurt the prestige of the U.S. abroad:

CROWLEY: I want to ask you the question, first, if there is no Security Council resolution approving of a war on Iraq, and if the Bush administration should go ahead, who loses in that scenario?

RICHARDSON: Well, I think the United Nations loses because it shows a lack of relevance to this crisis.

And, secondly, I think, Candy, that the United States loses because we're going into a major conflict without the blessing of the U.N. Security Council, without some of our major allies like France and Russia, and also those 10 other members of the Security Council, the 10 non-permanent members that have a voice right now.

So I think it would come at considerable cost especially if we're to win the war, which we would, issues relating to a post-Iraq configuration to the prestige of the United States worldwide to bring some kind of order to the Middle East and bring some kind of Persian Gulf-lessening attention. So, I think everybody would be a victim. The United Nations, the United States and, certainly, our NATO allies. I think would be hurt, too, because if they don't support us the breakdown of the NATO alliance might be next to go.

CROWLEY: Well, I want to cite a couple of figures for you. One of them just came from a CBS/New York Times poll, which showed that right now only about 34 percent of Americans believe the U.N. is doing a good job handling this situation.

Fifty eight percent think it's doing a poor job. On top of that, we also found that 55 percent would support an invasion, even if the Security Council says don't do it. What does that say about how Americans view the U.N., and has that changed since you were the ambassador?

RICHARDSON: Well, the United States as a populous, here in new Mexico, there's not much support for the United Nations. But at the same time, Candy, what everyone should understand is the United Nations does a lot of things that we, the U.S. as the only superpower, don't want to do.

They get involved in conflicts in Kosovo, in the Congo in Africa, in Guatemala and Latin America. Immigration issues, AIDS, refugees. We don't want to get directly involved in these, but we use the arm of international support, legitimacy of the United Nations to do it.

Now, in the Persian Gulf, conveniently, the U.N. supported our efforts in 1991 to get a broad coalition. And I think we've used the U.N. in the war on terrorism to get international support.

But clearly in this Iraq crisis, the U.N. has to step up and simply enforce its [1441] resolution. And it's not doing that. So, it's going to be a big loss for the U.N. in terms of its peacekeeping relevance, unless it really steps up and gets tough on Saddam Hussein. I think that's the issue.

CROWLEY: So, am I right, am I hearing you correctly that you believe that the U.N. Security Council should pass the resolution that Britain and the U.S. are proposing?

RICHARDSON: Well, I would go a little differently, Candy. I think the U.S. and Britain should compromise. That's the essence of diplomacy. To get nine votes, if it means postponing for 30 days, or 15 days or 10 days, a new resolution with benchmarks on Iraq's behavior, let's do it. I think that France and Russia are basically gone.

They are going to veto. But it would be a partial victory if we get nine votes for a victory of a majority in the Security Council. If we don't do that, I think it's going to be tremendous prestige loss overseas. I think, domestically, it's going to cause more problems for the administration. The Congress will be divided. This is a time when it's frustrating, but what's the rush, really. Iraq is not heading down Baghdad into the United States.

Again, it is a threat, but it's not an immediate threat. It's not something that is like the war on terrorism, where we're under alert from a potential terrorist attack in this country. So let's be judicious. Let's be calm. Let's be patient.


Bill Richardson: "Get out now. Get all our troops out now. It is the only right and responsible choice."
by Stephen Cassidy on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 10:45:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

ROFLMAO (none / 0)

Nice try.

"Let's not over rush here, and appear to be the arbiters of whether Saddam has the weapons or not. Look, he does have them. Past inspectors have said that, but let us not fall into his PR game of making us the bully rather than building a international coalition and letting the inspectors and the U.N. Security Council have a shot at determining whether there are violations ...I'd say in a month from now, we will know the success or failure of the inspections. In a week, we won't know. I say that if the inspections don't produce what everybody knows, then I think the administration is going to move forward with plans for military conflict and I, for one, would support them." - Bill Richardson, December 6, 2002 (CNN transcript)

Or just before the invasion...

"I think there is such intensive pressure on both sides that only one more deadline, only one more chance for Saddam Hussein is going to be allowable. So I think the administration is wise in pursuing this course that says OK, total disarmament in two weeks and that's it." - Bill Richardson, February 18, 2003 (CNN transcript)

I initially was supporting Richardson (even raised some money for him) but I withdrew my support after doing some more digging on his actual history and his numerous gaffes (Byron White as SCOTUS model?) ...but let's not try and re-write history and where Richardson really was about the invasion at the time shall we?


by lestatdelc on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 07:55:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ROFLMAO (none / 0)

Stephen will never engage you on the facts, he'll recite the same Richardson talking points in every diary and completely ignore all the gaffes.  He's very focused.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Wed Dec 05, 2007 at 12:15:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ROFLMAO (none / 0)

Here's a nice summary:

http://searchles.com/channels/show/1768

I'm not one to call someone out for flip-flopping on a whim; the Iraq situation is so volatile that changes in the best laid planes will be necessary. But Richardson clearly didn't know where his head was at until he started this completely disingenuous  immediate withdraw rhetoric.


by Sam Spencer on Wed Dec 05, 2007 at 02:05:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the latest Rasmussen poll (2.00 / 1)

shows Edwards with the highest favorability rating among Iowa Democrats, 85 percent, and also leading as the second choice of Iowa Democrats, with 28 percent.

So I don't buy David Yepsen's analysis that the angry Edwards has ruined his "sunny" image with Iowans.

I went to one of Richardson's house parties last Saturday. I would agree that he makes a favorable impression with Iowans in a setting like that. He criticized Edwards several times (without singling out Obama and Hillary), which suggests to me that either he thinks he can peel away Edwards supporters, or he thinks that there are a lot of undecided voters considering both him and Edwards.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 08:54:39 AM EST

Re: the latest Rasmussen poll (none / 0)

"either he thinks he can peel away Edwards supporters, or he thinks that there are a lot of undecided voters considering both him and Edwards"

Probably both statement are correct.  Thanks for you r even handed comments.


Bill Richardson: "Get out now. Get all our troops out now. It is the only right and responsible choice."
by Stephen Cassidy on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 10:47:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

he's now campaigned in 98 counties (none / 0)

Only missing Keokuk county in SE Iowa, and he will get there soon.

Edwards is the only other candidate this cycle to have campaigned in all 99 counties. I don't think there's any way Clinton, Biden, or Dodd will hit that milestone. I don't know the latest figures on Obama.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 09:00:32 AM EST

Re: he's now campaigned in 98 counties (none / 0)

Only Edwards has done all 99 and he hit that mark about a month or so ago.  That's quite a feat.

Clinton, Biden, Dodd, and Obama have not been to more than 60 (as far as I know) - and also from what I know, there are no plans for them to do so.


Help build a stronger and more progressive Democratic Party from the grassroots on up
by Peter from WI on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 10:27:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: he's now campaigned in 98 counties (none / 0)

Biden has now made it to 88 counties.


by SenorSwanky on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 11:02:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (none / 0)

Richardson is a problematic candidate. Aside from his position on Iraq, he's basically a triangulator with many positions similar to that of the RW. Add to this that he makes Kerry sound like a dynamic speaker.


by carter1 on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 09:52:57 AM EST

Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (none / 0)

He comes across like a used car salesman running for city council.


Help build a stronger and more progressive Democratic Party from the grassroots on up
by Peter from WI on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 10:27:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (none / 0)

And on what basis do you say that?  

The ultimate RW issue this campaign is immigration.  While Edwards, Dodd and Clinton have all moved to right and adopted the position of refusing the undocumented drivers' licenses Richardson has stood firm and defended his actions in New Mexico.  Richardson also has the most aggressive energy and climate change proposal of all candidates and the boldest solution for education (repealing No Child Left Behind).


Bill Richardson: "Get out now. Get all our troops out now. It is the only right and responsible choice."
by Stephen Cassidy on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 10:50:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (none / 0)

Richardson's economics are basically RW, ie. large tax cuts on capital gains, no tax on oil profits, pay for govt. expenditures by growing the economy rather than having the upper income pay their fair share (this just doesn't work). He's pro-gun & has no problem with huge subsidies for corporate farming.

He bases his campaign on a bipartisan approach to governance. Given that this is impossible until the Republican Party ceases being controlled by the far right, it leaves me wondering about his political instincts. On SS, he talks about people having to have portable 401Ks & having to moderate the program, which is usually code for cutting benefits.

The economic problems of the middle class/working people are getting worse & the country is ready for a progressive agenda. We're beyond the triangulation approach of Richardson (he's OK on pro-choice & his immigration views are colored by the heavy Hispanic population of NM).

PS. I was particularly put off by his attacks on Edwards' Two Americas theme, that it was class conflict. This is exactly what a RWer would say.


by carter1 on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 11:42:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Richardson's Downward Momentum (none / 0)

http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres08/ iadem8-713.html

From 12 to 4 in two weeks?  I'd be real optimistic about that, Cassidy.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden, the real dark horse on his way to a top-3 finish, went from 5 to 8 in that same two weeks and is now in the 4th-place spot Richardson had long occupied.  He is getting crowds of 100+ at most events in rural IA counties and still stays to answer all questions and shake all hands.  As I said above, he has visited 88 counties and had full-page ads in the 7 major papers this past Monday.  He has a strong chance of placing well in the rural precincts from where 51% of the state's delegates come.  I believe he is also strong in Davenport, Ames, and other towns.


by SenorSwanky on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 11:21:34 AM EST

Re: Richardson's Downward Momentum (none / 0)

It's nice to see I'm not the only one who thought Biden scored big with his performance at the last two debates.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 12:55:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Richardson Surging in New Hampshire (none / 0)

The ARG polls are all over the map.  In its latest New Hampshire poll Richardson has gone from 5% at the end of October to 10% now.  Biden dropped from 4% to 3%.

http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres08/ nhdem8-712.html


Bill Richardson: "Get out now. Get all our troops out now. It is the only right and responsible choice."
by Stephen Cassidy on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 01:08:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Richardson's Downward Momentum (none / 0)

He's been running in 4th place in the Dubuque area for a long time now.  Richardson doesn't even register there.


Help build a stronger and more progressive Democratic Party from the grassroots on up
by Peter from WI on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 02:16:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

well, Dubuque is probably Biden's best (none / 0)

county in the whole state. I wouldn't be surprised to see that outcome on January 3.

I don't think Richardson is losing support. I think the ARG poll was off on that. Biden may be gaining more than Richardson--I don't know. But I can't believe Richardson's support has collapsed.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Sat Dec 01, 2007 at 08:46:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Richardson: Setting The Stage For An Ups (none / 0)

I like Richardson. I think maybe he's a bit too conservative, but he definitely brings a lot to the table. His most important asset would have to be his breadth of experience and his solid record of accomplishment in New Mexico. My grandmother lives there and she has nothing but positive things to say about him, and that's rare for her with respect to anybody (even family!).

We're blessed to have so many good candidates on the Democratic side in this election, but I believe that there's just one candidate who holds the promise of transforming the political landscape in a way that would be much more favorable to progressive causes and that's Barack Obama.


by dmc2 on Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 11:37:12 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.